top of page

NOVREN GROUP · AI INFRASTRUCTURE FOR LAW FIRMS

novren n.png

NOVREN GROUP
We Empower Firms to Run on AI

Custom Claude implementation and AI infrastructure for law firms and professional services businesses — built by lawyers and technologists, for firms navigating AI adoption.

Three driving factors

Clients push for fixed-fee and AFAs, and scrutinize staffing mixes more than ever before.

Fee Pressure

Clients now do the work themselves with the same tools firms use. AT&T's LegalEdge already handles 20-25% of matters before they're sent to outside counsel.

In-House Client AI

Fixed-fee, tech-enabled firms are built to be efficient. Traditional billable-hour firms are structurally incentivized against it.

AI-Native Competitors

The legal clock started. Feb 2026: a federal judge ruled that using consumer AI tools voids attorney-client privilege over the work product, unless use is directed by counsel inside a governed system.

PROOF: IT'S ALREADY HAPPENING

Even Anthropic can't do this alone. In 2026, Anthropic built a $100M Claude Partner Network and Services Track, a formal acknowledgment that it can't be the on-the-ground deployment consultant for every firm. Audits, governance, firm-specific rollout: that's the role we're built to fill.

Sources: 1. Law360, AT&T LegalEdge (2026); 2. U.S. v. Heppner, S.D.N.Y. (Feb. 2026); 3. Anthropic Partner Network (2026).

Firms are not equipped to decide. And waiting doesn't make it cheaper or easier.

There is no one to make the call. Most firms under 50 people have no CTO or IT function that understands both legal workflows and AI well enough to decide. The pressure lands, and it has nowhere to go. Even the biggest firms are struggling to hire.

~50%

of law firms still have no formal AI governance policy in place

Real adoption is expensive, either way. The firm systems are already scattered across email, DMS, and billing. Every legal AI vendor on the market means real cost: migrating out of current tools, or training a firm that is not used to any of it.

45 min

average time spent on a single conflict check, searching across disconnected systems

Sources: 1. ILTA 2025 Technology Survey; 2. ABA 2025 Legal Technology Survey; 3. Bloomberg Law (2026).

$440K

now offered for law firm AI directors, with 16+ major firms posting roles they cannot fill

Affordable, but not equipped to design AI workflows, governance, or legal-grade compliance. NOT EXPERT ENOUGH.

Outsourced IT and MSPs

This is the space to introduce the Services section. Briefly describe the types of services offered and highlight any special benefits or features.

Service Name

This is the space to introduce the Services section. Briefly describe the types of services offered and highlight any special benefits or features.

Service Name

The New Professional Services Partner

We provide workflow architecture built per firm, one foundation for current and future tools, and compliance infrastructure from day one. We don't replace clients' tools — we bring them together, securely and seamlessly.

Technical Co-Founder & CTO. Nearly a decade building AI and ML infrastructure at scale across finance and high-frequency trading, including founding a top-ranked quant crypto fund. Alumni of Revenant, EXO Labs, CircleUp, and Springy.

Logan O'Malley

Operator Co-Founder & CEO. Took a consumer beverage brand from concept to 47 retail doors on $850K+ raised, navigating regulation, IP, and hiring firsthand. Stanford StartX founder; Presidential Scholar; alumna of Springy.

Maddie Largey

Technical Advisor. Years of experience deploying AI in regulated, high-stakes environments — from enterprise fintech to boutique law firms. MPL Legal Tech Advisors; followed by 5,000+ legal AI professionals.

Rok Popov Ledinski

bottom of page